Legal Opinion
MATTER OF PERLBINDER v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) reinstated.
The CAB found that petitioner was one of 15 partners in the. 442-unit residential building at 85 East 85th Street. He occupied two adjoining apartments with his wife and child for six years. In 1974, he vacated the premises, with no intention of returning, and sublet the apartments, with furniture, to respondent Frangos who has occupied them ever since. Upon Perlbinder’s refusal to renew Frangos’ sublease, Frangos filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- MATTER OF MID-STATE MGMT. CORP. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Badem Buildings v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Badem Buildings v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Myers v. FrankelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
- Bozzi v. GoldblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Edelstein LLC v. Rodriguez, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.