Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Rachmani Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 1986Published

1Dissent

Kupferman, J. P.,

dissents in part in a memorandum as follows: The selling agent, with respect to a cooperative plan, notified the tenants, by formal letter, that 35% had subscribed to purchase shares allocated to their apartments. As a result, numerous tenants completed their subscriptions just prior to the deadline for the insider price. The letter of notification did not add the fact that the offering plan and the mortgage commitment from the bank required the purchase of 40.5% in order for the plan to be declared effective.

The State of New York commenced the instant action, contending that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Badem Buildings v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API