Legal Opinion
Hutchins v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks an order annulling the decision of the Conciliation and Appeals Board, which granted subtenant Brundin the status of a prime tenant. Brundin thereby became entitled to a *810renewal lease under the Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, § YY51-1.0 et seq.) and restitution of rent overcharges. Petitioner alleges that the Board’s decision was illegal, arbitrary and capricious.
At issue is a question that has never been definitively analyzed by any officially reported case. Is a tenant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- William Gardam & Son v. BattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Boyce v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Caprino v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Vance v. Century Apartments AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Avon Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Badem Buildings v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hanlin Group, Inc. v. Power Authurity of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Kalimian v. OlsonNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- 216-220 East 67th Street Associates v. QuinnCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.