Legal Opinion

Pierce Et Vir v. D. L. W. R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant appeals and complains of the refusal of its motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts for the plaintiffs, in their suit for damages for injuries to the wife-plaintiff, sustained in alighting from a passenger train in the railway station at Scranton, Pennsylvania. Mrs. Pierce had become a passenger at Syracuse, New York; her destination was Scranton; she changed cars at Binghamton, New York, and boarded a fifteen car train which made no stops between Binghamton and Scranton. The train arrived at about 3:35 A.M., February 19, 1945. The car in which she was a passenger is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Stauffer v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Low v. Harrisburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Jameitis v. Wilkes-Barre Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Baron v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Stais v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Rogers v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. LeGrand v. Lincoln Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API