Legal Opinion

Stauffer v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1946No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

A young boy was killed in an accident. The parents claim that he was struck by defendant’s truck as a result of the driver’s negligence. The claim is opposed by defendant on the ground that there is not sufficient evidence to support it. The jury rendered a verdict for the administrator of $3,742.85 under the “Death” Act, and $17,000 under the “Survival” Act.

The rules prescribing the measure of proof required to establish negligence have been frequently stated; the difficulty is in their application. It is not enough to show merely that an accident…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Flanigan v. McLeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Houston v. Republican Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Cuthbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Lear v. Shirk's Motor Express Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API