Legal Opinion

Jameitis v. Wilkes-Barre Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1923No. Appeal, No. 311PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff’s husband’s death resulted from injuries received in a fall from the rear platform of defendant’s trolley car on which he was a passenger. Plaintiff-claimed deceased was visibly intoxicated at the time he entered the car and that defendant’s conductor failed to take such reasonable precaution for his safety as the circumstances required. The trial judge entered a non-suit which the court in banc refused to take off, assigning in support of its refusal that no evidence was adduced from which the jury could find the conductor was aware that decedent was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren v. Pittsburgh & Butler Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Kradel v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LeGrand v. Lincoln Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Pierce Et Vir v. D. L. W. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Callaway v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Gates v. Bisso Ferry Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Pierce v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API