Legal Opinion

Low v. Harrisburg Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1927No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The defendant company operates a street railway in the City of Harrisburg. On Cameron Street, as it approaches Market at right-angles from the south, there is laid a double line of tracks, and these connect with those on Market Street by means of rails, beginning ten feet south of the house line and foot-way, extending to the right and left, and running east and west to the latter named highway. The rails of the curves are of the grooved guard type, and have the customary opening at the top of 1 and 11/16 inches, with a depth of 1% inches. These connecting links…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Stebel v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Clogher v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Perret Et Ux. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Farrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Harris v. DeFeliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. MacDonald v. Philadelphia Rural Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Wright v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Gerlach Et Ux. v. City of Phila.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API