Legal Opinion

Hutt v. Hutt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1934No. 10010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment divorcing the parties, which in part recites: ,

“This cause came on to be heard in its regular order on the 25th day of January, A. D. 1933; and the plaintiff appeared in person and by attorney and announced ready for trial;' and the defendant appeared in person and by her attorneys and filed and submitted motion for a continuance which, upon due consideration, was .by the Court found to be wholly insufficient and without merit, and, therefore, overruled; and both parties having waived a jury, the cause proceeded to trial, the matters in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCullough v. McCulloughTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Jones v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Gulf Bitulithic Co. v. Nueces CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Hale v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Oilmen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dworkis v. DworkisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Oxspring v. OxspringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Ward v. WardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API