Legal Opinion

Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. Shell Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1943No. 9416PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

Rule 37 case. The appeal is from a final judgment cancelling a permit to drill well No. 3 on a 1.61-acre tract in the East Texas Oil Field and enjoining production thereunder. The Shell (Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, owner of a leasehold upon an adjoining tract) was plaintiff, and the Commission (Railroad Commission of Texas) and R&G (Roosth & Genecov Production Company, a Texas corporation) were defendants. The permit was granted as an exception to Rule 37, to prevent confiscation of property and physical waste. R&G alone has appealed.

Two assignments of error…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Trapp v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Foster v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cole v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Kegans v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Thomas v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Merriman v. LaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Hogrobrooks v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API