Legal Opinion

Hobdy v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1924No. 4 Div. 844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEoster, J.

The appellant was convicted for possessing a still. The evidence for the state tended to show that certain witnesses found at a house, where defendant was “reputed” to-live, a 10 or 12 gallon lard can which was smutty all over the bottom, a lid that went on the can, a pipe that fit a hole in the lid, 12 or 15 gallons of cane shimmings and meal, the kind of beer used for making whisky, that the beer, contained alcohol. The defendant was working in a field 150 or 200 yards from the house. He had been seen at the house once before, and went to the house and changed part of his clothing.

The owner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Gay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Ballentine v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Murphy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Etheridge v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Mathews v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API