Legal Opinion

Ballentine v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1923No. 8 Div. 43PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The judgment of conviction recites and adjudges defendant guilty under the first count of the indictment, so it will not be necessary' for us to consider the second count. The verdict being general, the conviction will be referred to the good count.

The evidence for the state established the fact that on or about December, prior to the finding of the indictment, the officers found a still in a cave in Lauderdale county, and there was sufficient evidence from which the jury migljt legally draw the- conclusion that whisky had been manufactured in the still at , a comparatively recent date. No…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Cannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Ex Parte EdmundsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Grubbs v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parsons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Hobdy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API