Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1925No. 2 Div. 331Published

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The evidence fails to connect defendants, or either of them, with possession of the stills found. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendants. Hobdy v. State (Ala. App.) 100 So. 571; Biddle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563, 99 So. 59; Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App; 176, 95 So. 830; Farmer v. State, 19 Ala. App. 560, 99 So. 59; Medders v. State, 19 Ala. App. 628, 99 So. 776; Watts v. State, 19 Ala. App. 549, 98 So. 914. Reversed and remanded.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Biddle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Farmer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Hobdy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Medders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API