Gay v. State

From a reading of the testimony in this ease there can be no ^oub,t that some one was unlawfully engaged in making, manufacturing, or distilling prohibited liquors, in the vicinity where defendant lived, but there is absolutely no evidence to connect this defendant therewith. He was entitled to the affirmative charge. Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401, 85 South. 835; Morris v. State, 18 Ala. App. 435, 92 South. 910; Clark v. State, 18 Ala. App. 217, 90 South. 16; Hammons v. State, 18 Ala. App. 470, 92 South. 914.

Reference to the cases cited supra discloses in each instance stronger facts for…