Legal Opinion

Hancock v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 13, 2005No. CA CR 04-992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

On February 2, 2004, appellant Richard Hancock entered a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3(b) (2004) to the offense of sexual abuse in the first degree. The trial court sentenced him to four years of probation. On appeal, Hancock challenges (1) the trial court’s denial of his' motion to suppress statements made by him during a phone call with the victim and her mother that was orchestrated by the State Police and (2) the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine to keep out of evidence the statements by his daughter,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Berry v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Dondanville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API