Legal Opinion

Cole v. Johnson Motor Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbis action was brought by the plaintiff to recover' damages for an injury sustained by ber through the alleged negligence of the defendant.

Briefly, the evidence tended to show that Billy Lipscomb, an agent of the defendant for the sale of its automobiles, to whom had been entrusted a demonstration car for the purpose of effecting such sales, was en route to contact a prospective purchaser who lived on or near the West Campus of Duke University — a doctor in Duke Hospital. When passing the East Campus, near the underpass of the public highway leading to his destination, he saw several young…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Morris v. Dame'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Albers v. Shell CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Murphy v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Wigginton Studio, Inc. v. Reuter's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Obdulia Rivera v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  3. Rogers v. Town of Black MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Russell Ex Rel. Russell v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API