Legal Opinion

Pringle v. La Chapelle

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1999No. B125935PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

Introduction

Plantiff and respondent Yvonne M. Renfrew, an attorney, sued defendant and appellant Frank La Chapelle for attorney fees. La Chapelle appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Renfrew. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

La Chapelle provides an appendix in lieu of a clerk’s transcript and a supplemental appendix as the record on appeal. We have not been provided with a reporter’s transcript and the provided appendices are incomplete. Further, the statement of the case is inadequate as there are few citations to the record. We recite only those facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Fuller v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API