Pringle v. La Chapelle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
Plantiff and respondent Yvonne M. Renfrew, an attorney, sued defendant and appellant Frank La Chapelle for attorney fees. La Chapelle appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Renfrew. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
La Chapelle provides an appendix in lieu of a clerk’s transcript and a supplemental appendix as the record on appeal. We have not been provided with a reporter’s transcript and the provided appendices are incomplete. Further, the statement of the case is inadequate as there are few citations to the record. We recite only those facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Fuller v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.