Legal Opinion

Angelillo v. City of Meriden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 4, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff had judgment for damages for injuries sustained by him as a result of a fall on a defective sidewalk. The defendant has appealed and in its assignments of error claims that the finding should be corrected and that the subordinate facts do not support the conclusion of liability.

Summer Street in Meriden enters Cook Avenue from the west but does not cross it. Cook Avenue is a heavily traveled highway in a thickly settled district. Between the east curb and the sidewalk there are some dirt areas about three feet wide, partially occupied by trees. Three feet north of the easterly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alston v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Corcoran v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Clark v. Borough of TorringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Tirendi v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Agriesto v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. McFarline v. MickensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Carbone v. City of New BritainConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Lyons v. Heid, No. Cv-94-0311175s (May 29, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API