Legal Opinion
Tirendi v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 9, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by a defective sidewalk of the defendant city. The defendant has appealed from the court’s denial of its motion to set aside the verdict. The jury could reasonably have found these facts: About a week and a half prior to September 1, 1938, employees of the W. P. A., in connection with the construction of a catchbasin, made an excavation about four and one-half feet square and four feet deep partly in the southerly sidewalk of Burton Street in Waterbury, and completely covered the hole with planks running in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Ritter v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Falkowski v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Shirlock v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Matchulot v. City of AnsoniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Mausch v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Nicefaro v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Aerotec Corp. v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Angelillo v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.