Legal Opinion

Harry Schoell v. Regal Marine Industries, Inc. And Emerald City Harbor, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 17, 2001No. 99-1511PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Harry Schoell is the inventor of a particular boat hull for a planing boat, patented under U.S. Patent No. 5,456,202 (the “'202 patent”). Schoell brought a patent infringement suit against boat manufacturer Regal Marine Industries, Inc. and one of its dealers, Emerald City Harbor, Inc. (collectively “Regal”). On Regal’s motion for summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ruled that Regal had not infringed the '202 patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. New Tek Manufacturing, Inc. v. BeehnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Vantage Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API