Legal Opinion

Hertz-Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1996PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice:

This is a worker’s compensation case involving a suspension of benefits under section 772 of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, 77 Pa.S. §§ 1 et seq. (“the Act”) Appellee Claimant Larry Bowers (“Claimant”) was employed by Appellant Employer Hertz-Penske Truck Leasing Company (“Employer”) as a Service Manager-Supervisor of Maintenance. On December 15, 1987, while at work, Claimant sustained an injury to his lower back when he slipped and fell inside a tank in the shop area. After the accident, Claimant continued to work in his same position without any loss in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Rossi v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Virgo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. BJ's Wholesale Club v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API