Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Does the Workers’ Compensation Act permit termination of benefits where a claimant is capable of performing his pre-injury job without restrictions despite minor residual physical effects from the injury? May benefits be terminated or suspended where, following the employer’s cessation of business, such a claimant begins working for a different employer, performing the same duties as his pre-injury job, at a lower wage? These are the questions raised in this appeal.
John W. Harle was employed as a pressman with Telegraph Press, Inc. While working on October 12, 1987, he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Sheridan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Anzon, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hertz-Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.