Legal Opinion

Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Does the Workers’ Compensation Act permit termination of benefits where a claimant is capable of performing his pre-injury job without restrictions despite minor residual physical effects from the injury? May benefits be terminated or suspended where, following the employer’s cessation of business, such a claimant begins working for a different employer, performing the same duties as his pre-injury job, at a lower wage? These are the questions raised in this appeal.

John W. Harle was employed as a pressman with Telegraph Press, Inc. While working on October 12, 1987, he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Sheridan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Anzon, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Hertz-Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API