Legal Opinion

Samuel J. Falcone v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Appeal of Samuel J. Falcone

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 13, 1986No. 86-5209PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal once again calls upon us to decide whether and under what circumstances an employer’s right to dismiss an “at will” employee is limited by a requirement that the employer follow certain procedures before terminating employment. The district court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment, orally holding that because the employer made no oral or written representations at the time of hiring limiting its right to dismiss, plaintiff’s claim failed to set forth a cause of action. We affirm. 1

I

Samuel J. Falcone was first hired by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Dowling v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Radich v. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Lunderstadt v. ColafellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API