Legal Opinion

Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1982PublishedCited by 477 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*460OPINION OF THE COURT

Fuchsberg, J.

In a matter raising an issue of wide concern to employers and employees, we must decide whether, in the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff, though not engaged for a fixed term of employment, pleaded a good cause of action for breach of contract against his employer because, allegedly, he was discharged without the “just and sufficient cause” or the rehabilitative efforts specified in the employer’s personnel handbook and allegedly promised at the time he accepted the employment.

The operative facts deserve emphasis. Taken most favorably to the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by477 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

472 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API