Engel v. Prostrollo Motors
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1J Mary Engel (Engel) was awarded odd-lot benefits under the Workers Compensation Act. Prostrollo Motors (Employer) appeals that decision. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] At the time of the hearing Engel was forty years old. She was a high school graduate, but had been a below average student. She had attended Mitchell Vo-tech for one year, completing a course in meat cutting. She has never been employed as a meat cutter. Her work history consists of unskilled positions involving heavy-duty labor.
[¶ 3.] Engel began working for Employer in August 1990 detailing cars. She was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Douglas School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Kester v. Colonial Manor of CusterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bonnett v. Custer Lumber Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Tiensvold v. Universal Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Krier v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peterson v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Stuckey v. Sturgis Pizza RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re TinklenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hayes v. AcuityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Wetch v. Crum & Forster Commercial InsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020