Legal Opinion

Engel v. Prostrollo Motors

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1J Mary Engel (Engel) was awarded odd-lot benefits under the Workers Compensation Act. Prostrollo Motors (Employer) appeals that decision. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] At the time of the hearing Engel was forty years old. She was a high school graduate, but had been a below average student. She had attended Mitchell Vo-tech for one year, completing a course in meat cutting. She has never been employed as a meat cutter. Her work history consists of unskilled positions involving heavy-duty labor.

[¶ 3.] Engel began working for Employer in August 1990 detailing cars. She was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Douglas School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kester v. Colonial Manor of CusterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bonnett v. Custer Lumber Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tiensvold v. Universal Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Krier v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Stuckey v. Sturgis Pizza RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re TinklenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hayes v. AcuityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  5. Wetch v. Crum & Forster Commercial InsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API