Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. Sturgis Pizza Ranch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2011No. 25605PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Michele Stuckey initiated this workers’ compensation proceeding to secure future benefits for a work-related injury. The Department of Labor did not award Stuckey a lump sum of future disability benefits, but it did award a partial lump sum to cover her attorney’s fees, costs, and litigation expenses. It also approved a life care plan for Stuckey’s future medical care. The circuit court reversed the Department’s denial of a lump sum award of future disability benefits but affirmed all other aspects of the Department’s decision. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lagler v. Menard, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Johnson v. UPSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hyperion I & IISouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Quality Permit Application of Hyperion Energy CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hayes v. AcuityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API