Stuckey v. Sturgis Pizza Ranch
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Michele Stuckey initiated this workers’ compensation proceeding to secure future benefits for a work-related injury. The Department of Labor did not award Stuckey a lump sum of future disability benefits, but it did award a partial lump sum to cover her attorney’s fees, costs, and litigation expenses. It also approved a life care plan for Stuckey’s future medical care. The circuit court reversed the Department’s denial of a lump sum award of future disability benefits but affirmed all other aspects of the Department’s decision. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lagler v. Menard, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Johnson v. UPSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Hyperion I & IISouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In re the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Quality Permit Application of Hyperion Energy CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Hayes v. AcuityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.