Legal Opinion
Patterson v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.
The issue here presented is whether a cross complaint, pleaded under the provisions of section 264 of the Civil Practice Act, against the City of New York, must comply with the requirements imposed upon “ every action or special proceeding, for any cause whatever, prosecuted or maintained against the city ” (Administrative Code of City of New York, § 394a-1.0, subd. a).
The action is brought against the city and the Pansy Amusement Company (hereafter called the “ Company ”) as codefendants, for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, which was caused by the acts of an employee of the city in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holmes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Northrup v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Pulitzer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Weiner v. Mager & Throne, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1938
- Bigelow v. DuBuqueNew York Supreme Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paretta v. White Acres Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Chambland v. BrewerNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Bennett Excavators Corp. v. Lasker-Goldman Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Keesler v. City of Peekskill, New York County Courts1955