Legal Opinion
Bennett Excavators Corp. v. Lasker-Goldman Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames S. Brown, J.
Plaintiff and the individual third-party defendants move for an order pursuant to subdivisions 4 and 5 of rule 109 of the Buies of Civil Practice, dismissing “ the counterclaim set forth in the answer of the third-party defendant, Standard Accident Insurance Company ”, designated by Standard in its pleading as “an amended claim against the plaintiff and third-party complaint against the defendants, James Bennett and Nicholas Somma”, on the ground that the “said counterclaim or third party complaint ’ ’ is not one which may be properly interposed, and on the further ground that it does not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Victory Painters & Decorators, Inc. v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Cornehlsen v. DudensingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Paretta v. White Acres Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arthur Venneri Co. v. Central Heating & Plumbing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Concord Factors Corp. v. LipmanNew York Supreme Court · 1962