Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. DuBuque

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

The plaintiffs have instituted the above actions

against the defendants to recover damages arising out of an automobile accident, wherein an automobile owned by plaintiff Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Boston, Mass., and driven by plaintiff Maude M. Bigelow came into collision with three cars, driven by the defendants, on the Seneca turnpike in Madison county, N. Y. The defendant Yrooman interposed an answer in each action containing two alleged counterclaims against the plaintiffs and the defendant DuBuque for damages to his car and to his person arising out of the collision of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. MastroeniNew York Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cote v. Autocar Sales & Service Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Deneau v. BeattyNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Patterson v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Ribbon Narrow Fabric Co. v. Wellington Shoe Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  5. Libassi v. VaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API