Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, C. J.
The City of Cleveland: (hereinafter designated “City,” appellee in Case No. 34959 and appellant in Case No. 35002) operates the Municipal Electric Light Plant (hereinafter designated “MELP”) serving approximately twenty per cent (20%) of the retail load within the City of Cleveland. The remainder of that load is served by the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (hereinafter designated “CEI,” appellant in Case No. 349-59, and appellee in Case No. 35002), a public utility under the Federal Power Act. 1
The facilities of MELP have been described as “ * * # an isolated, poorly designed and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Del. for New Castle Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- E. Liverpool v. Buckeye Water Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Malone v. Academy of Court ReportingOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Akron v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.