Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1996No. 69584PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Karpinski, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, city of Cleveland and American Municipal Power-Ohio (“AMP-Ohio”), appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs filed their complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against defendant-appellee, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (“CEI”). The dispute arose when CEI refused to commit to transmitting a guaranteed level of power as requested by Cleveland Public Power (“CPP”) for the month of June 1995. The reason CEI gave for refusing was that one of its generating facilities was not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Del. for New Castle Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Graham v. City of Lakewood, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Blakeman's Valley Office Equipment, Inc. v. BierdemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brakefire, Inc. v. OverbeckClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2007
- Buzzard v. Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- DeRosa v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.