Seaman v. McQueen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The record indicates that the trial court granted j udgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground that the evidence established plaintiffs contributory negligence as a matter of law. “[I]n passing on a motion for judgment n.o.v., the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.” Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C. 640, 648, 197 S.E. 2d 549, 554 (1973). Judgment as a matter of law then on the ground of contributory negligence should be granted only when plaintiffs contributory negligence is so clearly established that no other reasonable inference or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Jones v. SchafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Currin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sabates v. SabatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Ferguson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Chiltoski v. DrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Gram v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Love v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.