Legal Opinion

Chiltoski v. Drum

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1995No. COA95-198PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant appeals the award to plaintiff of a new trial pursuant to N.C.R. Civ. P. 59 (Rule 59). We reverse the trial court.

On 10 August 1992, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action against defendant. In his answer, defendant admitted that operating his automobile in such a manner as to collide with the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle constituted a breach of the duty of care owed plaintiff. However, defendant specifically denied that his negligence proximately caused any bodily injury to plaintiff.

*162At trial, the court combined the issues of causation and damages into a single…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. In Re the Will of HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Garrison v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Seaman v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Westbrook v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AGTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Martin v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Anderson v. HollifieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Sockwell & Associates, Inc. v. Sykes Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Jones v. Southern General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API