Chiltoski v. Drum
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Defendant appeals the award to plaintiff of a new trial pursuant to N.C.R. Civ. P. 59 (Rule 59). We reverse the trial court.
On 10 August 1992, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action against defendant. In his answer, defendant admitted that operating his automobile in such a manner as to collide with the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle constituted a breach of the duty of care owed plaintiff. However, defendant specifically denied that his negligence proximately caused any bodily injury to plaintiff.
*162At trial, the court combined the issues of causation and damages into a single…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- In Re the Will of HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Garrison v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Seaman v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Westbrook v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AGTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Martin v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Anderson v. HollifieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Sockwell & Associates, Inc. v. Sykes Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Jones v. Southern General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.