Mathis v. Scott
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
Upon the habeas corpus hearing the plaintiff in error insisted that he was not guilty of the crime for which he was sentenced in the city court of Waynesboro. But the evidence disclosed that he entered a plea of guilty. A confession of the offense by a plea of guilty has the same effect as if he had been tried and found guilty by the verdict of a jury. Jackson v. Lowry, 171 Ga. 349 (155 S. E. 466). On the trial of a habeas corpus proceeding, where it is shown that the detention of the person whose liberty was restrained was by authority of a judgment of the city court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Aldredge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Elam v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Jackson v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Holley v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Gay v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Hilliard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Archer v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.