Legal Opinion

Aldredge v. Williams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1939No. 12966PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

A discharge under a writ of habeas corpus, after a conviction, can not be granted unless the judgment is absolutely void; as where the convicting court was without jurisdiction, or where the defendant in his trial was denied due process of law, in violation of the Federal fourteenth amendment (Code, § 1-815) and the State constitution, art. 1, see. 1, par. 5 (Code, § 2-105). Since the'writ can not be used merely as a substitute for a writ of error or other remedial procedure to correct errors of law, of which the defendant had opportunity to avail himself, no question as to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wilcoxon v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Bush v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. White v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API