Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 7, 1961No. 38648, 38718PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

“If a verdict, when construed with the indictment, does not find the defendant guilty of any offense, the judgment should be arrested; but where, regardless of the denomination of the offense, the allegations of the indictment charge, even imperfectly, a violation of the law, which can be plainly understood by the jury, and a verdict finding the defend- and guilty can not be ignored without violating the rules of common sense, sentence should be pronounced upon the finding.” Lanier v. State, 5 Ga. App. 472, 476 (63 S. E. 536); Rumph v. State, 60 Ga. App. 689 (4 S. E.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cross v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Heard v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Hathcock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Mathis v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Clarington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Sherman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Staples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API