King v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Presiding Judge.
“If a verdict, when construed with the indictment, does not find the defendant guilty of any offense, the judgment should be arrested; but where, regardless of the denomination of the offense, the allegations of the indictment charge, even imperfectly, a violation of the law, which can be plainly understood by the jury, and a verdict finding the defend- and guilty can not be ignored without violating the rules of common sense, sentence should be pronounced upon the finding.” Lanier v. State, 5 Ga. App. 472, 476 (63 S. E. 536); Rumph v. State, 60 Ga. App. 689 (4 S. E.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cross v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Heard v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Hathcock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Mathis v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kaiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Clarington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Sherman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Staples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.