Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1941No. 13572PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The extraordinary motion for new trial was not dismissed or otherwise disposed of on inspection of its allegations. On the contrary, the trial judge entertained it for the purpose of investigating the facts, and then, after hearing evidence on both sides, passed an order finding the issues of fact in favor of the respondent, and denying the motion. Thus, even if the allegations themselves should be treated as stating absolute cause for a new trial for the reason that the movant was denied the benefit of counsel and due process, or for other reason, still the case does not come…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Herndon v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Burney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Sims v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. United States Ex Rel. Mitchell v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  4. Wilcoxon v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Fowler v. GrimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API