Hammond v. Ringstad
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, District Judge.
This is an action for the specific performance of a renewal clause in a lease of real property.
The lease, which was for a period of five years, was in consideration of the mutual agreements of the parties. The lessor leased the property to the lessee for the above-mentioned term, agreeing to pay taxes on the premises up to Two Hundred Dollars ($200) per year. It further provides :
“2. Lessor hereby agrees that if this lease be in full force and effect thirty (30) days prior to the termination of the said five year period ending May First, 1945, lessee may, at his option,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hall v. WeatherfordArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Young v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Nakdimen v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Kenai v. FergusonAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Altman v. Alaska Truss & Manufacturing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Moss v. OlsonOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Edgewater Enterprises, Inc. v. HollerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.