Altman v. Alaska Truss & Manufacturing Co.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the superior court erred in ruling that the defendants to this action, Alaska *1217Truss & Manufacturing Co. (“ATM”) and Woods & Rohde, Inc. (“W & R”), do not owe the plaintiff, David Altman, any rent in addition to that which they have already paid. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the superior court correctly held that ATM and W & R do not owe any additional rent to Altman for the leased premises. We find it necessary, however, to remand the case to the superior court for further consideration of whether ATM…