Legal Opinion
Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 15, 1939No. 6700PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decree of the District Court holding the agreement of June 20, 1927, 1 to be a “valid and subsisting contract” for an exclusive license to United Engineering and Foundry Company, hereinafter called United, under the Steckel patent No. 1,779,195.
This litigation between the parties has been here twice before. The first suit was filed March 7, 1931, in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for the infringement of the patent issued to A. P. Steckel, October 21, 1930, for “an improved rolling mill and method whereby…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- High Knob, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.