Legal Opinion

Mulnix v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The Insurance Company, as petitioner, by mandamus, seeks to enforce the payment of a state warrant drawn by the state auditor upon the state treasurer. Prior to the convening of the seventh general assembly the secretary of state, in pursuance of the statute, by an advertisement duly made, invited sealed proposals for stationery and certain other articles required by said general assembly and the executive departments of state for the two years commencing on the 2d of January, 1889.

Lawrence & Co. tendered a bid which, upon investigation, was accepted by the secretary of state, and a contract…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Law v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Potter v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. StandleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. City of Colorado Springs v. CorayColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Swedlund v. Denver Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. Adams County Community Center for Retarded & Seriously Handicapped, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API