Legal Opinion

Swedlund v. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 20, 1941No. 14,839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock

This is an action by the Denver Joint Stock Land Bank, appearing in its own behalf and in behalf of all others similarly situated and one Noel, defendants in error here, to obtain a court decree declaring: That the Big Bend Drainage District, one of the defendants, was not properly organized, and that all acts and proceedings of its trustees and officers, as such, particularly in the issuance of certain warrants of the district, are null and void; that title to lands lying within the boundaries of the district be quieted in the owners; that the cloud upon such titles created by warrants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Town of Durango v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Sullivan v. City of LeadvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  5. Lincoln & Dawson County Irrigation District v. McNealNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Normandy Estates Metropolitan Recreation District v. Normandy Estates Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Cherry Creek Aviation, Inc. v. City of Steamboat SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Brunette v. Idaho Veneer CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Carey v. CareyColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. NORMANDY EST. MET. REC. DIST. v. Normandy Est., Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API