People v. Vaughan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DESMOND, J., pro tem.
The defendant was convicted of violating section 288a of the Penal Code in relation to a girl eleven years old; also upon another count of the same information of violating section 288 of the Penal Code involving another girl of the same age. Attached to the verdict and ordered filed by the court was a slip of paper reading as follows: “If admissible, the jury would like to recommend leniency.” Motion for a new trial was denied and defendant sentenced on each count to San Quentin State Prison for the term provided by law, one sentence to follow the other.
The defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.