Legal Opinion
Consolidated Electric Light Co. v. Brush-Swan Electric Light Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided June 10, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
This is an amended bill brought upon five different patents, — one for an electric lighting system, one for an improved regulator for electric lights, one for an improvement in electric lamps, one for an improvement in carbons for electric lights, and one for an improvement in the treatment of carbons for electric lights,-^-and is demurred to for multifariousness. The bill alleges that the patented inventions are capable of being used conjointly; that the orator makes, uses, and sells conjointly, as parts of the same electric lighting system, each and all of said inventions in some essential…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hayes v. DaytonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- Diamond Match Co. v. Ohio Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
- Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Philadelphia & R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
- American Graphophone Co. v. Leeds & Catlin Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
- Edison Phonograph Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.