Legal Opinion

Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. Webb

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided October 4, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This is a suit in equity for the infringement of two patents relating to fasteners for shoe buttons. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The plaintiff company is the owner of a patent dated October 31, 1892, No. 266,941, for a button fastener, and also of another patent dated June 10, 1890, No. 429,828, for a holder for button fasteners. The hill is filed for an infringement of both these patents, and, on argument, it is conceded that there has been infringement if the patents are valid.

Single Patent for Two Inventions.

There is a defense made of multifariousness which was overruled on demurrer. This is also somewhat connected with the defense that patent No. 429,828 is had on its face because it covers twm separate and…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
  3. United Dispatch, Inc. v. E. J. Albrecht Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  5. Morton v. LlewellynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API