Legal Opinion

American Graphophone Co. v. Leeds & Catlin Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 9, 1904No. 8,570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patents. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

The demurrer raises various objections to the bill:

1. That the letters patent are void on their face for lack of invention. In the circumstances of the case, this attack is obviously futile, and my action thereon needs no explanation.

2. That it is multifarious, in that it involves the validity and infringement of two separate patents. The bill avers not only that they are capable of conjoint use, but that they are used conjointly by the complainant, and that the defendants jointly infringe both patents by their product, In a general sense, the demurrer should be taken to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Electric Light Co. v. Brush-Swan Electric Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rose Mfg. Co. v. E. A. Whitehouse Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Southern Plow Co. v. Atlanta Agricultural WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1908
  3. Victor Talking Machine Co. v. American Graphophone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API