Edison Phonograph Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patents. On demurrer to bill.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
The bill is demurred to on the ground of multifariousness, because it involves the validity and infringement of three separate patents; but it is averred in the bill that the three are not only capable of being conjointly used, but that, in the apparatus of the defendant complained of, they are in fact so used. This is a distinct and positive averment, which the demurrer necessarily admits. It cannot be made to deny and question it, thus raising an issue of fact, even though that be one of the grounds of demurrer assigned. It may be that, as proferí of the patents is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hayes v. DaytonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
- Consolidated Electric Light Co. v. Brush-Swan Electric Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rose Mfg. Co. v. E. A. Whitehouse Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
- Southern Plow Co. v. Atlanta Agricultural WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1908
- Vibration Specialty Co. v. Balancing Service Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1935