Legal Opinion
United States v. Marachowsky
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 3, 1953No. Crim. No. 13111PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEHAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States . of America, has filed a motion to supplement the rec*131ord in this criminal action. The motion has been made under the provisions of Rule 75, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., which governs by reason of Rule 39(b) (1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S. C.A., which provides that the rules governing preparation of the record on appeal in civil actions shall apply to the record on appeal in criminal proceedings.
The defendants have appealed from an order of this court denying their motions for arrest of judgment and for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MarachowskyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Belt v. HoltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Askins v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re WT Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Franceschi v. Rivera EchevarríaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- Nahodil v. RodmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Franceschi v. Rivera EchevarríaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- Sobaszkiewicz v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022