Legal Opinion

Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 26, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

This is a motion to settle the record on appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals and its disposition depends upon the interpretation to be given to Rule 75, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, particularly subdivisions (a) (e) (g) and (h).

The several plaintiffs declared their separate causes of action in a consolidated complaint demanding treble damages for defendants’ alleged conspiracy to violate the anti-trust laws of the United States.

Defendants upon a single motion, 30 F. Supp. 389, sought six items of relief:

1. For the dismissal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. International Business Machines Corp. v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Treasure Imports, Inc. v. Henry Amdur & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. In Re WT Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. Belt v. HoltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. MarachowskyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API