Columbia Placer Co. v. Bucyrus Steam Shovel & Dredge Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants in each of the foregoing- cases from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Elliott, J., denying a motion of the defendants, appearing specially and for the purposés of the motion only, to dismiss the action, and to vacate a temporary injunction in the first-named action.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
In each of these cases a motion was made on behalf of the defendants to have the action dismissed for the reason that no legal service of the summons had ever been made upon the defendants, or either of them. From the order of the district court denying the motion, in all three cases, the defendants appealed to this court. The facts are identical in all of the cases, and the appeals were argued as one, and so considered by this court. Both defendants are foreign corporations, and, at the time of the alleged service upon them, neither had any office or agent in the state of Minnesota. The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KaufertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Curran v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Kaiser v. ButchartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Kertson v. Great Northern Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898