Legal Opinion
Curran v. Nash
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1947No. 34,488PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order overruling the special appearance of defendant Harold Buhler objecting to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that he was a nonresident and that the court had not acquired jurisdiction over him or over the property described in the complaint.
According to the allegations of the complaint, Herman Buhler, a resident of Ramsey county, Minnesota, died testate in December 1945, naming his son, defendant Harold Buhler (hereinafter referred to as Buhler), a resident of California, as residuary devisee and' legatee in his will. Defendant Thomas…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KaufertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Bubar v. DizdarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Speyer v. Savogran Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.